Socrates271 said:
it wouldn't hurt to install a backup / update manager for the testers would it?
As I keep saying: It would be a joke (develop-wise) to either make the game ask if you want to update - or to have an early-adopter-option (defaulting to off) in the Minecraft.net preferences. Only early adopters would receive
every update. All others would only receive the updates in which SSP and SMP work.
About 850,000 people bought the game by now. Did they buy it with the intention to be testers? No. "But they ARE testers!" Well, that's just an evilish-ignorant attitude. He knows what the people want, could easily give it to them, but he plays stupid and treats them like they were not real persSons.
And what does he achieve? Broken game for 850,000 people, negative word-of-mouth effect (I mean, at this point, Notch's quality as a programmer should have become public knowledge, something that cannot be in his business interest!), Feedback from far too many sources, many repeating what others already said. If he'd only get feedback from people who want to get every single update, it would take away the feedback of people who didn't really want to test on the bleeding edge, the quality of the feedback would sure increase. Also, the rest of the community could happily play.
I mean, is it not clear as day? It is
not Markus Persson's priority to have the people happily playing. Plain and simple. I don't know, though, what his priorities really are. To get the final product out? Hardly. Otherwise, he'd reduce the feedback to a well-spoken willing tester core group.
Compare this to other software, like Opera beta or something like that: You get updates, and they suck from time to time, but they work. On top of that, you could download the nightly builds. What Notch keeps releasing has the quality of nightly builds.
And you know what? With other software, the website explicitly warns you not to use the nightlies (or whatever untested version). With Notchware, you are even forced to take every update.
I wrote to him once that the updates should be optional or the bit about the Minecraft.net preferences. One or two days later, he wrote in his blog that he realized that it would be better to make the updates optional. Could be a coincidence. Point is, he already knows that it would be better, but he just doesn't make it happen, even though it would be a joke for a real programmer.
As I keep saying:
The problem is his attitude.